← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29231/2015bail granted

Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-29Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29231 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -322 Year- 2014 Thana -SAUR BAZAR District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Chandan Yadav S/o Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village Kariyat, Police Station Sour Bazar, District Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-10-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 25 (1-b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, after search of house of the petitioner one country made Masket (fire arm) was recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the alleged search and seizures have been conducted without complying the mandatory provision of law. The petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2014. He has got 14 other cases also, in some of the cases he has been acquitted and in some of the cases he is on bail and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. submits that in one case he is not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29231 of 2015 (3) dt.29-10-2015 2/2 on bail.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the alleged recovery and detention of the petitioner, now the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Ashutosh Kumar, J.M. 1st Class, Saharsa in Sour Bazar P.S. Case No. 322 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T