Ranjeet Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19465 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-174 Year-2018 Thana- CHAND District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Ram Son Of Late Kumar Ram Resident Of Village Bharuhiya P.SChand Dist- Kaimur At Bhabua 2.

Bhola Ram Son Of Ranjeet Ram Resident Of Village- Bharuhiya P.SChand, Dist- Kaimur At Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 14-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against the petitioners that they

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19465 of 2021(4) dt.14-02-2022 2/3 have abducted the wife of the informant and established physical relationship with her. The victim has not been recovered till date.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for the alleged occurrence of 05.01.2018, a complaint was filed on 23.01.2018 which came to be registered as F.I.R on 02.08.2018. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and the thrust of accusation is against one Rajnath Ram. Considering the fact that there is direct allegation against the petitioners to have kidnapped the wife of the informant and the victim has still not been recovered, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners stands rejected. Let learned Court below consider the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners without being prejudiced by the order of this Court, if the petitioners surrender within a period of four week from today and pray for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19465 of 2021(4) dt.14-02-2022 3/3 regular bail.

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands disposed off.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T