Raj Nath Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16856 of 2016 ====================================================== Raj Nath Singh Son of Sri Raj Nandan Singh R/o Village and P.O.- Ular, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, Block- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.
The Secretary, Department of Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Danapur, Patna. 5.
The Centre Incharge Paddy procurement Block- Dulhin Bazar, DistrictPatna. 6.
The Patliputra Central Bank Dulhin Bazar Branch through its Branch Manager, Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
7.
The BCEO Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
8.
The B.D.O. Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
9.
Ular Sorampur PACS through its Chairman namely Smt. Pushpa Devi Wife of Sri Chandra Mohan singh Village - Ular, P.O. - Bharatpura, P.s. Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna, Bihar - 801102.
10.
Sri Kalyan Singh @ Sonu Kumar son of ................... R/o VillageP.S.- ........................ District- Patna, The Chairman Ular Sorampur PACS, Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
11.
The Suchitra Rice Mills Sailhauri Dulhinbazar, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, Patna. 12.
Sri Kant Prasad son of Not Known, The Proprietor/Manager of the Suchitra Rice Mills Sailhauri Dulhinbazar, P.S.- Dul 13.
The Bihar State Food Corporation Patna.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Indra Mohan Kumar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Uday Shankar Sharan Singh-Gp19 For the BSFC :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.10 :
Mr. Akash Deep, Advocate For Respondent No. 11,12:
Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, Advocate Mr. Saurav Kumar Suman , Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-01-2026
1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to
Patna High Court CWJC No.16856 of 2016(11) dt.06-01-2026 2/2 challenge the impugned order before appropriate authority in accordance with law.
2. Permission is granted.
3. Accordingly, this application is disposed with the aforesaid liberty.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U