← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/150/2020withdrawn

Brajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-24The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.150 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Banka ====================================================== BRAJESH KUMAR Son of Shankar Prasad Choudhary Resident of VillageSuiya, P.S.-Katoriya, District-Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Banka. . 3.

The S.H.O., P.S.-Suiya, District-Banka. .

4.

Nazia Parveen Wife of Brajesh Kumar, D/o Abdul Salam Resident of Village-Suiya, P.S.-Katoriya, District-Banka. 5.

Abdul Salam Son of Md. Usmaan Gani Resident of Village-Suiya, P.S.- Katoriya, District-Banka.

6.

Rashida Khatoon Wife of Abdul Salam Resident of Village-Suiya, P.S.- Katoriya, District-Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, A.C. to A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 24-06-2020 The petitioner prays for the following reliefs :- "A. For issuance of a writ in the nature of habeas corpus commanding the respondent No. 2 and 3 to immediately recover and rescue the Respondent No.4 (wife of the petitioner) from the custody of respondent no. 5 and 6 and produce her before this Hon'ble Court.

B. For a further writ or direction to the

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.150 of 2020(5) dt.24-06-2020 2/2 respondent authorities to accompany the wife of the petitioner (Respondent No.4) and provide protection to them.

C. For any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions which may be fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, wife of the petitioner (respondent No.4) has been rescued and handed over to the petitioner, as such the same has become infructuous. As prayed for, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) P.K.P./- U