Pooja Kumari @ Pooja Kumari Mourya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 9515 of 2021 ====================================================== Pooja Kumari @ Pooja Kumari Mourya Daughter of Vibhav Chandra Prasad @ Manan Prasad resident of village - Ramchandrapur, Ward No. 10, Police Station- Thawe, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.
3.
The Sub-divisional Officer- cum Licensing Authority, Gopalganj. 4.
The District Supply Officer, Gopalganj.
5.
The Block Develpment Officer, Thawe, District- Gopalganj. 6.
Sanju Kumari @ Sanju Devi wife of Kaushik Raj Ramchandrapur, Police Station- Thawe, District- Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr Arvind Ujjwal, SC IV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 11-02-2022 This case has been taken up for online hearing through video-conference because of COVID 19 pandemic restrictions.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some argument, seeks permission to withdraw this writ application with a liberty to avail remedy before appropriate forum against selection of Respondent No 6 for grant of licence for running a Public Distribution Shop under Bihar Targeted Public
Patna High Court CWJC No.9515 of 2021(2) dt.11-02-2022 2/2 Distribution System (for brevity, BTPDS) (Control) Order, 2016, ignoring the petitioner's claim.
This application is permitted to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly.
If any application/appeal is filed within four weeks from today with an application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall be obliged to consider the same keeping in mind the fact that the petitioner was pursuing her remedy before this Court by filing the present writ application and decide the petitioner's appeal on merit within the period, as stipulated under the BTPDS (Control) Order, 2016. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U