Raj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20719 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2020 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR MAHTO SON OF YADOLAL MAHTO R/O VILLSISWANIYA, P.S- RAMGARHWA, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Patanjali Rishi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 142 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the fact that prima facie case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20719 of 2021(2) dt.03-12-2021 2/2 of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019 (2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pravinkumar/- U