Manjula Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18585 of 2016 ====================================================== Manjula Devi Wife of Late Madan Mahto Resident of Village-Bhawanipur Noniya Tola, P.S.-Bhawanipur, District-Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, General of Police, Bihar, Patna 3.

The Inspector General of Police, District-Purnea 4.

The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, District-Purnea 5.

The Superintedent of Police , Purnea 6.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Purnea 7.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Dhamdaha, District-Purnea 8.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Purnea 9.

The Inspector of Police, Purnea 10.

The Officer Incharge, Bhawanipur, P.S. District-Purnea 11.

Vijay Kumar Son of not Known, Manager Khadhi Bhandar, Bhawanipur P.S. Bhawanipur, District-Purnea 12.

The Secretary, Sarboday Asaram Khadhi Gram Udyog Department, Ranipatra, Purnea ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Partha Sarthi- Ga4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(I). For issuance of writ/writs, in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents specially Respondent no. 10 and 11 not to dispossess the position of the petitioner or not to vacate from the house of the petitioner.

(II). For commanding the Respondents as to why

Patna High Court CWJC No.18585 of 2016(2) dt.06-04-2023 2/2 the Petitioner has been directed to vacate from the house and also form the shop.

(III). For commanding the Respondents as to why they in are keeping the law and their hands and finally pass the order with regard to vacate from the legal possession of the petitioner since regularly and monthly he is paying the appropriate rent." After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U