Patna High CourtCR. MISC./8972/2022rejected

Raju @ Md. Raju v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-06Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8972 of 2022 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2016 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== RAJU @ MD. RAJU S/o Firoj Residet of Bhadal, P.S.- Danghar, DistrictBangpat (U.P.) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 17718 of 2017 vide order dated 25.04.2017. At the time of granting bail the coordinate Bench directed the petitioner to surrender within a period of six weeks. The petitioner did not surrender within the stipulated period and thereafter he filed a modification petition i.e. Cr. Misc No. 41966 of 2017 for the extension of time of his surrender. That criminal miscellaneous petition was disposed of vide order dated 06.09.2017, mentioning therein that this Court is not inclined to interfere with the above order and it was also observed that, however, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below and makes prayer for regular bail, the learned lower court will

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8972 of 2022(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 consider this aspect of the matter and will pass appropriate order. Even after passing of the order dated 06.09.2017, the petitioner did not obey the order of this Court and did not surrender before the court below and after five years he is filing this petition for extension of time of his surrender which is not possible. Accordingly, it is rejected.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/- U T