Vibhishan Ojha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19277 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-486 Year-2019 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

VIBHISHAN OJHA Son of Sant Kumar Ojha Resident of Fulwariya, P.S.- Garakha, District- Saran.

2.

Sant Ojha Son of Kedar Ojha Resident of Fulwariya, P.S.- Garakha, DistrictSaran. 3.

Surendra Mishra Son of Rameshwar Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

4.

Satya Devi Wife of Surendra Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

5.

Nagendra Mishra Son of Rameshwar Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

6.

Pappu Mishra Son of Nagendra Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

7.

Nikku Kumari D/o Pappu Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

8.

Annu Devi Wife of Sanjay Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

9.

Kamleshwar Mishra @ Sanjay Mishra Son of Ramesh Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

10.

Akhileshwar Kumar Mishra Son of Ramesh Mishra Resident of Hasanpur, P.S.- Nayagaon, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Savita Devi Wife of Jitendra Mishra Resident of Gola Bajar, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-02-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19277 of 2021(3) dt.23-02-2024 2/2 quashing application, granting liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points which have been raised in the present application, before the learned court below, at the appropriate stage.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. This quashing application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as indicated above.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T