← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9426/2023allowed

Sarita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9426 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2022 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SARITA DEVI W/O PRADIP PASWAN R/v- Manikpur Musahrniya, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.240 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner and other co-accused persons are said to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the victim girl has not supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9426 of 2023(2) dt.20-04-2023 2/2 Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Considering the fact that victim girl has not supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., let petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th-cumSpecial Judge (POCSO Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Parihar P.S. Case No.240 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) S.KUMAR/- U T