Tanvir Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14074 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2022 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== TANVIR ALAM S/O LATE TASIBUDDIN R/v- Gunasamesar, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Bahadurganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Bahadurganj P.S. case No. 185 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner has allegedly caused the death of the informant's sister namely, Hina Firdausi by stabbing with knife and cutting her neck. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 20.6.2022.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14074 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner is named in the FIR upon whom the informant has made specific allegation that he committed murder of his sister namely, Hina Firdausi by stabbing with knife. The postmortem report annexed with the case diary corroborates the prosecution version in which the deceased sustained sharp cut wounds and doctor opined that cause of death is due to sharp cut weapon. It is further submitted the witnesses of the case have also supported the prosecution.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is direction allegation against the petitioner, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T