← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51271/2015bail granted

Pappu Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2016-01-30Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51271 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -270 Year- 2014 Thana -RAMNAGAR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Pappu Sah. son of Late Ganga Sah, resident of Village Narainapur, P.S. Ramnagar, District West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Milind Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 270 of 2014 registered for offences under sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. The first information report has been lodged. Allegation has been made to have theft about 30-40 mobiles by breaking lock of the shop of the informant. Details have been given in the first information report. The name of the petitioner has surfaced during investigation.

The petitioner carries two cases, one is of similar nature.

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51271 of 2015 (2) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 petitioner is in custody since 24th January 2015. Looking to the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Ram Nagar P.S. Case No.

270 of 2014 , subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds and (iv) the petitioner will report to the Police by 7th of every month for at least nine months.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T