Laxman Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16828 of 2017 ====================================================== Laxman Chaudhary son of Shri Bikram Chaudhary, Resident of VillageBaghlochana Matiyaria, P.O. Priti Matiyaria, Police Station- Lauria, DistrictWest Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah. 2.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran. 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Narkatiaganj, District- West Champaran.

4.

The Anchal Adhikari, Lauria, District- West Champaran. 5.

The S.H.O. Lauria Police Station, District- West Champaran. 6.

The Circle Inspector, Lauria Circle, District- West Champaran. 7.

Indradeo Chaudhary, son of Late Tengari Chaudhary null 8.

Suresh Chaudhary, son of Late Tengari Chaudhary 9.

Makhu Chaudhary, son of Late Tengari Chaudhary 10.

Bhola Chaudhary son of Late Tengari Chaudhary 7 to 10 are resident of Village- Baghklochana Matiyaria, P.O. Priti Matiyaria, Police StationLauria, District- West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bashishtha Narayan Mishra,Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy,GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-05-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.That, this application is being filed for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs directing the respondents for removal of encroachment from the land appertaining to Khata No.19, Khesra No.953, Area 2 decimal situated in Mauza-

Patna High Court CWJC No.16828 of 2017(3) dt.09-05-2023 2/2 Matiyaria, Thana No.458, which has been illegally encroached by the respondents no.7 to 10 and for giving vacant possession to the petitioner after removing the encroachment."

The learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the encroachment in question, has already stood removed, hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U