Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51344/2015dismissed

Charitra Sah @ Ranjeet Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2015-11-10Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51344 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2015 Thana -MATIARIA DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Charitra Sah @ Ranjeet Sah, son of Late Bhajan Sah, resident of villageSonbarsha, P.S. Matiyariya, District- West Champaran .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Vikram Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. Mr. Madhav Roy, Adv.

Ms. Swati Roy, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2015 Heard Sri Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Ms.Swati Roy, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Madhav Roy learned counsel, who has appeared on behalf of the informant. The petitioner, who is in custody since 16.09.2015 in connection with Matiyariya P.S. Case no.48/15 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He has orally submitted that the informant was a man of a lady, who was instrumental in lodging number of cases against the petitioner and,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51344 of 2015 (2) dt.10-11-2015 2/2 as such, he makes a prayer for grant of bail. He also submits that a Title Suit in between the said lady and the petitioner is going on. Ms. Roy, learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail. She submits that in the occurrence, one finger and some portion of the hand of the informant was amputated and at the time of occurrence itself, the informant had raised alarm. Thereafter, number of witnesses had arrived and they all have supported the case.

Keeping in view the nature of accusation as well as period of custody, the Court is of the opinion that it is not a fit case for extending the privilege of bail. The petition stands dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U