Jyotendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11541 of 2018 ===========================================================

1. Jyotendra Kumar, S/o Late Yogendra Prasad Chaudhary, Resident of MohallaSikandarpur, P.S.- Town, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary (Management), Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Drainage, Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siya Ram Shahi For the Respondent/s : Mr. ANJANI KUMAR- AAG4 Mr. Brajesh Kumar, A.C. to AAG-4.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-07-2018 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging his transfer order from Sitamarhi to Bhagalpur as has been claimed by the petitioner that six month earlier he was transferred to Smastipur in very short span of time, he cannot be transferred on administering ground. 3.

Though it is an general order of transfer, the petitioner has been transferred on administration ground, but no such entry has been recorded with respect to other candidate except this petitioner but in

Patna High Court CWJC No.11541 of 2018 dt.18-07-2018 2/2 the column of petitioner, the reason has been mentioned transfer on administrative ground. However, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already been relieved from Sitamarhi and also joined Bhagalpur.

4.

In such view of the mater, it appears that the petitioner has already filed a representation to Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna dated 6.6.18. Let the Principal Secretary consider the representation of petitioner about his grievance raised by him in this representation. For convenience, the petitioner should file afresh representation giving all details of fact and on receipt of the representation, within three months, the representation of the petitioner would be disposed of by reasoned order. 5.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Sanjeev/- AFR/NAFR NA CAV DATE NA Uploading Date26/07/2018 Transmission Date NA