Md Ansar @ Md Ansar Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11170 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2025 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Md Ansar @ Md Ansar Ahmad S/o Md Khalil R/o Village- Chhatwan, P.SKewati, Distt.- Darbhanga, Bihar. 2.
Kamar Jahan @ Bilkis @ Pano Khatoon W/o Late Safi Akhtar @ Mujahir R/o Village- Chhatwan, P.S- Kewati, Distt.- Darbhanga, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate.
Mr. Nouman Ahmad, Advocate.
Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anish Chandra, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Kedar Jha, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kewati P.S. Case No.285 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 245, 74, 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner no.1 alongwith co-accused Md. Dablu @ Khurshid and Md. Altaf tried to build a house on the ancestral land of the informant which was opposed by the informant. It is further alleged that on the the order of petitioner no.2, accused persons including the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11170 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/3 petitioner no.1 assaulted the informant and her family members causing injury to them.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties, due to which a free fight taken place, in which both the parties received injuries. Learned counsel submits that the injury to the injured is simple in nature. He further submits that there is delay of about 6 days in lodging the F.I.R. without any plausible explanation. Learned counsel submits that the allegation against the petitioners are general and omnibus. He further submits that petitioners have got clean antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation against the petitioners as well as their clean antecedent, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11170 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 3/3 Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Darbhanga, District Darbhanga/ concerned Court in connection with Kewati P.S. Case No.285 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T