Chandan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9161 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2021 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Son Of Shasibhusan Pandit Resident Of Village - Aattasaray, P.S.- Nursarai, Distt.- Nalanda. At Nursarai. .. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Adv Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 03-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against the petitioner that he has abducted the minor daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is the student of I.T.I and on the alleged date of occurrence, the petitioner had appeared in the examination of his course which was 50 K.M away from the place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9161 of 2022(3) dt.03-11-2022 2/2 occurrence. Moreover, the victim was recovered from the house of the informant itself.

Learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C has specifically alleged against the petitioner that he forcefully took her to the house of his sister where they stayed for some days.

Considering the fact that the victim in her 164 Cr.P.C statement has specifically alleged against the petitioner to have forcefully took her to his sister's house, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T