Lalit Kumar Singh v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through The Chairman Cum Managing Director And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17467 of 2017 ====================================================== Lalit Kumar Singh Son of Late Mathura Prasad Singh, resident of VillageRampur, P.S. Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through The Chairman Cum Managing Director and Ors 2.

The Deputy General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Kolkata. 3.

The Deputy General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited Marketing Division, Bihar State Office, 4.

The Regional Manager, L.P.G. Indane Regional Office Barauni, DistrictBegusarai. 5.

The District Supply Officer, L.P.G. Indane Lakhisarai, District- Lakhisarai. 6.

The Marketing Officer, L.P.G. Indane Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. 7.

The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai.

8.

The S.D.O. Lakhisarai.

9.

The Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai.

10.

The Station House Officer, Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai. 11.

Priti Rani, Proprietor M/S Surajgarha Indane, Surajgarha, P.S. Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai Bih 12.

Anil Verma, S/o Late Jagdeo Verma, resident of Village- Surajgarha, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai Bihar.

13.

Sadhna Verma, W/o Anil Verma, Resident of Village- Surajgarha, P.S.- Surajgarha, District- Lakhisarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the IOCL :

Mr.Sanat Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.P.K.Verma -AAG-3 :

Mr.Dr.Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025

1. This Court has passed a detailed oral order on 19.06.2025 which reads as follows:- "1. No representation for the petitioner.

2. The Learned counsel for the respondent-

Patna High Court CWJC No.17467 of 2017(3) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 IOCL reported that the matter has become infructuous.

3. However, for giving a fair opportunity to the Learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 27.06.2025, as a last indulgence."

2. In spite of it, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for default and for nonprosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) vinita/- U