Sita Devi v. The Secretary Ministry Of Road And Surface Transport Govt. Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17594 of 2017 ====================================================== Sita Devi W/o late Rajendra Jha R/o Village- Khnuli, P.O.- Jhanjharpur, P.S.- Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Secretary Ministry Of Road And Surface Transport Govt. Of India and Ors 2.
The Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Road and Surface Transport Govt. of India, New Del 3.
The Chief Engineer, N.H.57, National Highway Authority of India. 4.
The Competent Officer Cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani. 5.
The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha -Sc19 Mr.Manoj Kr. Sinha, AC to Sc-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.
2. The present petition has been preferred for :- "(a) To direct the respondents to pay the compensation for the land which has been acquired by the respondents for widing the N.H.Road 57 in the year 2006.
(b) To direct the respondents to pay interest upon the compensation amount which has not been paid to the petitioner after acquisition of the land in the year 2008.
(c) To direct the respondents to pay the compensation amount against the land bearing plots nos 1598A, 1742A, 1606A, 1619A on which
Patna High Court CWJC No.17594 of 2017(2) dt.17-06-2025 2/2 no any compensation amount has been paid till date.
(d) To direct the respondents to pay the compensation with statutory interest which is upon the amount of compensation to the petitioner. (e) The direct the respondents to pay compensation for cattle shed amounting to Rs. 2 lacks which was also demolished by the respondents.
(f) To grant any other/others relief-reliefs for which the petitioner is. entitled under the facts and circumstances of the instant case."
3. Learned State counsel submits that the matter relates to the year 2006 and ten years later, the present petition has been filed.
4. Since there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Saurav/- U