Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9880/2019bail granted

Md. Hanif v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-20Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9880 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2018 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== MD. HANIF Son of Md. Yaiub Resident of Village-Jhariyagari, P.S.- Giridih Dist-Giridih (Jharkhand).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sheikh Arkan Ahmad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 413/414/399/402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A/26/35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that six persons were apprehended by the police from car. Thereafter, the police made search of those persons. It is alleged that from possession of this petitioner one loaded country made pistol and one live cartridge was recovered.

Learned APP for the State submits that there are three other cases pending against this petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is on bail in all

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9880 of 2019(2) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 these cases.

Petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2018.

Keeping in view the period of custody already spent by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 161 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/mu keshU T