Indu Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.450 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1606 of 2017 ====================================================== Indu Devi wife of Shri Ram Kishun Sah, resident of village- Pindouna Khurd, P.O.-Nishiauta, P.S.- Nishiauta, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The State Information Commission, Patna, Information Building (Fourth Floor), Bailey Road, Patna through its Commissioner. 4.

The Deputy Director, Food and Consumer Protection, Tirhut Commissionary, Muzaffarpur, Pin Code- 842001 -cum- First Appellate Authority.

5.

The District Supply Officer-cum-Public Information Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali, Pin Code- 844126.

6.

The Circle Information-cum-Block Information Officer, Patepur, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Upendra Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Government Pleader 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 25-07-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing CWJC No.1606 of 2017, which has stood dismissed on account of non-prosecution by an order dated 12.12.2024.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since due to inadvertence, the case could not be marked in the daily cause-list, the counsel for the petitioner could not appear

Patna High Court MJC No.450 of 2025(3) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 in the Court when the case was called out for hearing, hence, the aforesaid petition was dismissed on account of nonprosecution, thus a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition be restored to its original file. 3.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing CWJC No. 1606 of 2017 to its original file. 4.

The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U