Neyaz Ahmad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17627 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Neyaz Ahmad, son of Md. Ajig, resident of Mohalla- Yusufganj, P.S. Laheriasarai,, District-Darbhanga.

2. Manoj Kumar Paswan, son of Shri Ramesh Paswan, resident of villageBaruara, P.S.-Kekla (Bahadurpur) District-Darbhanga.

3. Mahejabi Khanam, wie of Samir Khan, resident of mohalla-Old Munsafi, P.S.-Lalbag, District- Darbhanga.

4. Pankaj Kumar, son of Yogendra Prasad Chauhan, resident of mohallaBakarganj, P.S.-Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga

5. Neelam Kumari, daughter of Bhubneshar Mahto, resident of mohallaHaiderpur Pandaul, P.S.-Pandaul, District-Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga

5. The District Education Officer, Darbhanga

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Darbhanga.

7. The Block Education Officer, Bahadurpur, Darbhanga

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Basatpur, DistrictDarbhanga

9. The Head Master, Primary School Basatpur, Block-Bahadurpur, District-Darbhanga.

10. The Head Master, Primary School, Usmath, Block-Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Jha-3 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madanjit Kumar - Gp20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Mr. Satish Chandra Jha, appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by a decision of this court in C.W.J.C. No. 417 of 2015. He submits

Patna High Court CWJC No.17627 of 2017 (2) dt.01-12-2017 2/2 that this case may also be disposed of in the similar term like the writ petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 13305 of 2017. Counsel for the State has no objection in disposal of the writ petition in terms of the order dated 17.11.2017 in C.W.J.C. No. 13305 of 2017.

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.6 to consider the case of the petitioners in the light of decision in C.W.J.C. No. 417 of 2015 if the case of the petitioners is found similar on fact to the petitioners of C.W.J.C. No. 417 of 2015, the benefit arising out of such decision must reach the petitioners within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U