Sadaee Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3008 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2015 Thana -TANDWA District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sadaee Ram son of Baudh Ram, resident of Village- Harihar Urdana Tole Sangwa, Police Station- Todwa In the District of Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Indu Bala Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-03-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Tandwa P.S. Case No. 18 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly due to land dispute, altercation was going on between the petitioner and the husband of the informant thereafter, the petitioner took away the husband of the informant and started assaulting him and when the informant was brining her husband to the house, the petitioner gave knife blow resulting he became injured and senseless. However, he was brought at the private clinic as due to night he was not taken to the government hospital and in the morning when he was brought at government

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3008 of 2016 (3) dt.15-03-2016 2/2 hospital, Kutumba the Doctor declared him dead. Submission is of false implication and that the deceased died due to some disease and the Doctor, who has conducted post-mortem examination, has not found any injury on the arm and as such the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration to which the learned APP opposes by submitting that witnesses during investigation has supported the prosecution version.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner serious in nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, his such prayer stands rejected in connection with Tandawa P. S. Case No. 18 of 2015 pending in the court of learned Additional District Judge, VII, Aurangabad. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) ajaypd./- U T