Bhedha Ram @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19464 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2020 Thana- UPHARA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Bhedha Ram @ Sudhir Kumar Son Of Kishore Ram R/O Village- Nimra, P.S.- Uphara, Dist.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Uphara P.S. Case no. 61 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
The matter relates to assault by the petitioner and others to the son of the informant over a trivial dispute. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to previous enmity. He has got no criminal antecedent. General and omnibus allegations have been alleged against him. It is further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19464 of 2021(2) dt.16-12-2021 2/2 submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that eight persons are made accused in the present case but from perusal of the injury report, annexed as Annexure-2 to the petition, only two injuries have sustained by the son of the informant, which are lacerated wound and swelling, caused by hard and blunt substance.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Uphara P.S. Case no. 61 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Aurangabad subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U