Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar Shah v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10267 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== JITENDRA KUMAR @ JITENDRA KUMAR SHAH Son of Sri Khira Sah Resident of village-Shahpur, p.s.-Shahpur, Dist- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Poonam Devi Wife of- Jitendra Kumar Sah, Daughter of- Ram pukar Sah Resident of village-Shahpur,p.s-Shahpur,Dist-Bhojpur.at present Sainik, Colony, Road No.-2, P.S.M.M.C.H, District-Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State as also the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.279 of 2018 registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code besides Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 10.05.2019 passed by this Court, the petitioner went at the Maika of the opposite party no.2 and took her to his house and, at present, the opposite party no.2 is residing at the house of the petitioner for the last two months.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10267 of 2019(4) dt.11-07-2019 2/2 On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submits that the opposite party no.2 is living at the native village of the petitioner and not at the service place of the petitioner. In reply to the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to keep the opposite party no.2 at his service place as he is posted at Haryana. Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender by him within six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Complaint Case No.279 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T