Patna High CourtCWJC/255/2018disposed

Kamlesh Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.255 of 2018 ===========================================================

1. Kamlesh Kumar, S/o Shri Baldeo Rai, Resident of Village- Kharhanya, P.ORampur Kesho, @ Malahi, P.S.- Paru, District- Muzaffarpur.

2. Suman Kumar, S/o Shri Girja Rai, Resident of Village- Gopinathpur, P.S.- Kathaiya, P.O.- Mahima Gopinath District- Muzaffarpur.

3. Saroj Kumar, S/o Shri Ray Kishor Rai, Resident of Village- Morshandi, P.O. Morshandi, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Program Officer, (Establishment, Muzaffarpur).

5. The Block Development Officer-cum-Member Secretary Block Teacher Employment Committee, Block Motipur, Muzaffarpur.

6. Mukhiya of Panchat Barjee, Block- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

7. Mukhiya of Panchayat Harnahi, Block- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

8. Panchayat Secretary, Panchyat, Barjee, Block- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.

9. Panchayat Secretary, PanchayatHarnahi, BlockMotipur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

10. The B.E.O (Block Education Officer), Motipur. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Hitesh Suman, SC-13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the writ application is covered by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017 dated 14.11.2017.

If the case of the petitioners is similar to the case of

Patna High Court CWJC No.255 of 2018 dt.19-01-2018 2/2 appellant in L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017, dated 14.11.2017, the respondents are required to extend the same benefit to the present petitioners.

In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to examine the case of the petitioners in the light of the decision of the Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 501 of 2017. Decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 23.01.2018 Transmission Date 23.01.2018