Patna High CourtCWJC/100/2018disposed

Parwez Alam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.100 of 2018 =========================================================== Parwez Alam Son of late Md. Yusuf Resident of Village- Khalilabad, Ward No.25, P.S. Araria, District- Araria, at Present posted as Headmaster , Zakir Academy High School Dehti, P.S. Palasi, District-Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Purnea Division, Purnea.

6. The District Magistrate, Araria.

7. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Araria. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Chandra Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, SC-28 Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, AC to SC-28 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-03-2018 In view of the fact that the appeal has already been preferred by the petitioner against the order impugned in the present writ application, the writ application itself is disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 to finally decide the appeal of the petitioner by a reasoned and speaking order within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in view of the fact that the petitioner has now superannuated, yet the respondents have not disposed of the appeal, which is statutory in nature, filed by the petitioner on 03.09.2016.

Patna High Court CWJC No.100 of 2018 dt.16-03-2018 2/2 It is needless to state here that the respondents are required to take decision with regard to the period, the petitioner was under suspension for payment of salary, as they have not passed any separate order how to treat the suspension order and whether the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary for the suspension period. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date20.03.2018 Transmission Date