← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52463/2015bail granted

Madan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2015-12-15Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52463 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -339 Year- 2015 Thana -AHIAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Madan Prasad Son of Biswnath Prasad, Resident of Village - Minapur Center, P.s. Minapur, District -Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. A.L. Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in the first information report but, on the basis of his self incriminating confessional statement made in different case, Rs.8,500/- has allegedly been recovered and is being considered to be out of the looted money. It is also contended that, except this case and another one being Minapur P.S. Case No. 131/2015 registered under Sections 414/400/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case. Petitioner claims to be remanded in this case on 5.5.2015 and he has not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52463 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 been put on T.I. parade.

Having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Madan Prasad is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sunil Kumar Tripathi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur in Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 339/2015, with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be his father.

If the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found involved in similar nature of cases then the concerned court would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U T