Dhiraj Bind @ Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10317 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2022 Thana- KAJRAILICHAK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== DHIRAJ BIND @ DHIRAJ KUMAR SON OF JOTISH BIND @ JYOTISH VIND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SIMIRYA, P.S.- KAJRAILI, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution case, some unknown person killed the daughter of the informant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown person. He submitted that during investigation, the petitioner has been implicated in the present case only on the basis of confessional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10317 of 2023(3) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 statement of co-accused Badal Kumar, which has no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. He further submitted that there is no consistent evidence, no eye-witness of the occurrence to show that the petitioner has involved in the said crime. From the perusal of the impugned order, it appears that Charge-sheet has been submitted and framed. He is languishing in judicial custody since 24.05.2022.
The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Kajrailichak P.S. Case No. 28 of 2022. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T