Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11595/2025bail rejected

Dipesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11595 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2024 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dipesh Kumar Son of Yogendra Rai @ Bhogendra Rai R/o - Village-Murliya (Muryaliya), P.S - Pupari, District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1 .

The State of Bihar 2.

The Union of India, NDPS Act, Patna High Court Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pranav Kumar , APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3 . As per prosecution case , on the alleged date and time of occurrence, informant along with members of the patrolling party intercepted one vehicle and on search , 5 kgs of Ganja was recovered. Petitioner happens to be registered owner of the vehicle in question .

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . No incriminating article has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11595 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that huge quantity of ganja has been recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and fact that huge quantity of ganja has been recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner happens to be registered owner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T