Akshay Kumar v. Gangasagar Yadav And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2549 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2641 Year- 2014 Thana -BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Akshay Kumar Son of Lalan Prasad Yadav @ Lalan Yadav, resident of village- Majrohi, P.S. & P.O.- Pirpaiti, Sub Division- Kahalganw, DistrictBhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Gangasagar Yadav Son of Shivnath Yadav, resident of village & P.O.- Topra-tila, P.S.- Pirpaiti, District- Bhagalpur

2. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Heard Sri Vikash Kumar Sharma, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioner has filed this petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Ganga Sagar Yadav, opposite party No. 1.

It is submitted that in the order sheet it has been typed that "admittedly, the petitioner borrowed money from the complainant and the same was to be adjusted" but it should have been typed that petitioner borrowed money from the complainant and promised to adjust that amount but the same was not adjusted and that is why the complaint case was filed in which Ganga Sagar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2549 of 2016 (2) dt.22-06-2016 2/2 Yadav was granted anticipatory bail.

In my view, there is no ambiguity in the order as the amount promised to be adjusted was not adjusted. I do not find ay reason for cancellation of bail granted to opposite party No.1. With the aforesaid observation, this petition is disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T