← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/726/2018dismissed

Navendra Jha v. Mr. Hashmukh Adhiya, The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance Department, Econimic Affairs And Banking Di

2022-08-02Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.726 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3349 of 2004 ====================================================== Navendra Jha, son of Late Kulanand Jha, Chairman, The Rahika Central Cooperative Bank Limited, Madhubani. At and P.O.- Thana More, P.S.- Sadar, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

Mr. Hashmukh Adhiya, the Secretary, Ministry of Finance Department, Economic Affairs and Banking Division, Union of India, Jeevan Deep, Parliament Street, New Delhi.

2.

Mr. S.K. Mazumdar, the Chief General Manager, NABARD, Maurya Lok, Patna.

3.

Mr. Suresh Das, The Managing Director, Bihar State Co-operative Bank Limited, Ashok Rajpath, Patna.

4.

Mr. Narendra Prasad Mandal, the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

5.

Mr. Amrit Lal Meena, The Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Purushottam Jha, Advocate For the Union of India :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Sr. C.G.C Ms. Radhika Ram, C.G.C.

For NABARD :

Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 For the O.P. No.4-Bank :

Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful violation of the judgment and order 17.04.2015 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.3349 of 2004.

Patna High Court MJC No.726 of 2018(3) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the writ Court has been complied with. In such view of the matter, there is no need to proceed further in the matter. Accordingly, this contempt application stands disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U