Md. Junaid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9553 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-586 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Junaid Son of Md. Gasul @ Gaisul Nadaf Resident of Village- Rangpura, P.S.- Mirganj, District- Purnea, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act and Sections 310(4), 310(5) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that police has apprehended on Dheeran Sah and he has disclosed that he along with his friends was planning to commit some offence. On the basis of information given by apprehended person, police reached at the place of occurrence and apprehended the petitioner along with other. From the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol along with three live cartridges and a mobile phone were recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9553 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The seizure list witnesses are police personnel and police has not followed Section 105 of BNSS while preparing the seizure. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 25.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having two criminal antecedents.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 586 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T