Ram Prasad Yadav @ Ram Pd. Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.635 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -255 Year- 2014 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Ram Prasad Yadav @ Ram Pd. Yadav, Son of Late Gopali Yadav, Resident of Village - Barhara, P.S.- Narpatganj, Distt- Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER ........................

04-03-2015 Heard Sri Gopal Shankar, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Anirudh Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ram Anurag Singh, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and Sri Gopal Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the informant. The petitioner, who is in custody in Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 255 of 2014 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the informant side are agnates and due to land dispute, occurrence had taken place. He further submits that there was specific accusation against one MahanandYadav, who had inflicted Farsa blow on the head of the deceased due to which he fell down. Of course, the allegation against the petitioner is that he

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.635 of 2015 (3) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 gave Bhala blow in the abdomen of the deceased. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. It was submitted that there is specific accusation against the petitioner that he gave Bhala blow in the abdomen of the deceased. The injuries indicated in the post-mortem examination report are sufficient to prove involvement of the petitioner. I do not find any ground to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner. The petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U