Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14414/2024bail granted

Biltan Yadav @ Bilatin Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-07Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14414 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-528 Year-2022 Thana- BARBIGHA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Biltan Yadav @ Bilatin Yadav S/O RAJO YADAV R/O VILLAGE- MAFO, PS.- MEHUSH, DIST.- SHEIKHPURA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rizwanul Haque, adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his/her arrest in a case in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 528 of 2022 dated 01.12.2022 for the offence/s punishable u/ss 30(a), 32(ii), 41(i) and 52 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 981 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the Scorpio Pickup vehicle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the said vehicle. The name of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14414 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 2/3 petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the coaccused, Deepak Ram and Manish Kumar. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one more criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel has submitted that no case is made out against the petitioner. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on the record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his/her arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14414 of 2024(2) dt.07-03-2024 3/3 anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Sheikhpura in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 528 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T