Naushad Alam @ Naim Akhter v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10483 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2025 Thana- JIYAPOKHAR District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Naushad Alam @ Naim Akhter S/o Md. Hussain @ Hasan Resident of Village- Nijidpur, P.S.- Thakurganj, District- Kishanganj, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mohammad Akhter Hussain, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jiyapokhar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305 of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that unknown miscreants have committed theft in the house of the informant. The informant found that a suitcase containing gold and silver ornaments and Rs. 15,000/- in cash i.e. total worth Rs. 6,50, 000/- was stolen. It is further alleged that one of the accused Nahid Alam was apprehended who has disclosed the name of this petitioner.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. From perusal of the seizure list it will transpire that from the house of one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10483 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 Iftekhar Alam, two bangles of silver, one silver chain and mobile were recovered. It has further been submitted that no T.I.P. was conducted of the stolen items and the recovery which has been made from the house of Iftekar Alam belongs to him, it is not the stolen article. It has also been submitted that save and except the statement of the co-accused Nahid Alam, there is nothing against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 25.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Kishanganj in connection with Jiyapokhar P.S. Case No. 36 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T