Pappu Baidh @ Jai Prakash Baidh @ Pappu Baidya @ Jai Prakash Baidya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55081 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2015 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Pappu Baidh @ Jai Prakash Baidh @ Pappu Baidya @ Jai Prakash Baidya, son of Nand Kishor Baidh, resident of village - Bishunpur, P.S. - Dev, District - Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 30-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Deo P.S. Case No.18 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 324, 307, 354 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code besides Sections 3(i) (xi)/3(ii)(v) of the SC/ST Act, pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Aurangabad.

The accusation against the petitioner is to cause injury at the neck of the victim, namely, Manvati Devi, the daughter of the informant, Kanchan Paswan, through sharp cutting weapon by putting the cloth on her mouth due to protest made by her for moving the petitioner at the place, where she had gone to attend

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55081 of 2015 (3) dt.30-01-2016 2/2 the call of nature.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.04.2015.

On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner for bail and submits that the victim has supported the allegation against the petitioner and the injury on the neck of the victim was found grievous in nature caused by sharp cutting weapon.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail stands rejected at this stage. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T