← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/469/2024disposed

Laxman Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-18Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.469 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7046 of 2023 ====================================================== Laxman Paswan son of Late Sita Ram Paswan, resident of Village/MohallaBela, Police Station-Lalbagh, Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Pal, Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Mr. Pankaj Kumar Pal, Rural Works Department, Vikash Bhavan, Patna, Bihar.

3.

Mr. Bhagwat Ram, The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Vishveshvaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4.

Sri Ramdev Choudhary, the Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Darbhanga, District-Darbhanga. 5.

Sri Pratap Paswan, Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Rural Works Division, Biroul, District-Darbhanga.

6.

Mr. Raj Kumar (II),The Accountant General (A and E) Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Alok, SC 27 For the AG, Bihar :

Mr. Chaitanya Swaroop, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Kumar Alok, learned SC 27 for the State and Mr. Chaitanya Swaroop, learned counsel for the Accountant General, Bihar.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State informs that substantial amount has been paid to the petitioner subject to the final outcome of LPA No.776 of 2024 which has

Patna High Court MJC No.469 of 2024(10) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 been filed against the order dated 13.10.2023 passed in CWJC No.7046 of 2023.

3. In view of the information given by Mr. Kumar Alok, learned SC 27 in presence of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, I find that the order has been substantially complied.

4. The petitioner is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as and when he finds it proper.

5. The present contempt petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U