Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9448 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Ravi Kumar Sahni @ Ravi Kumar Sahani Son of Ashok Sahni @ Ashok Sahani Resident of Village- Ajamnagar, P. S.- L. N. M. U.- Dist- Darbhanga 2.
Rohit Sahani Son of Pitambar Sahni Resident of Village- Balughat, P. S.- L. N. M. U,- Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Saurav Anand For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Matloob Rab ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 242/2024 dated 30.06.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, some unknown miscreants entered the house of the informant and took away ornaments, cash of Rs. 14,000/- and utensils worth Rs. 8 lacs. It is further alleged that they also damaged the articles kept in the house of the informant's uncle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9448 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioners have sprung up in the course of investigation. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 23.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21560/2025. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have five antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 11.09.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Benipur at Darbhanga, in connection with Bahera P.S. Case No. 242/2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T