← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10189/2019dismissed

Rajvir Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-05-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10189 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-420 Year-2018 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== RAJVIR CHOUDHARY Son of Sheonath Choudhary Resident of Village - Bhachhiyar, P.S. Jamui, District Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jamui (Adarsh Thana) P.S.Case no.420 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B) and 354(D), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the I.T. Act..

Allegation against the petitioner as per FIR is that the photograph of the daughter of the informant was made viral on the net and for that the informant was disturbed and in the night while he was returning the petitioner called him and disclosed that he made photographs viral and on his protest abused him and assaulted him.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no way concern with making photographs viral as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10189 of 2019(4) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 he is not attached with the Whatsapp group and further he is not known to her.

Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the petitioner has himself disclosed to the informant that he has made the photograph viral.. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on the basis of materials available on the record.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T