Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11002 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2022 Thana- MOTIPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH KUMAR YADAV Son of Rajinandan Ray R/v- Purani Bazar, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Motipur P.S. Case No.73 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 469 & 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magsitrate, West Muzaffarpur.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he in association of co-accused, Rambabu Sah was making duplicate Aadhar Card.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11002 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the petitioner is the Aadhar Supervisor of Comtech Info Solutions Private Limited, which is authorised by the Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna for making Aadhar Card.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that considering the nature of the allegation as well as larger interest of public, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T