Deo Raj Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.722 of 2021 In Letters Patent Appeal No.832 of 2016 ====================================================== Deo Raj Mahto son of late Pragash Mahto, resident of village Bijhor, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, (Bihar) 5.

The Chairman of the District Education, Establishment Committee, Aurangabad, Bihar.

6.

The District Education Officer, Aurangabad, Bihar. 7.

The District Programme Officer, Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Vinay Prasad Singh, AC to GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 22-10-2024 The present MJC is filed for restoration and to recall the order dated 29.06.2016 passed in L.P.A. No. 832 of 2016.

2. Whereas the present MJC is filed in the year 2021 after lapse of about 5 years, sufficient cause has not been shown to explain the delay of about 5 years, except stating that petitioner's Advocate was suffering from severe fever on 26.07.2016. Therefore, it is not a fit case for recalling the order

Patna High Court MJC No.722 of 2021(4) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 dated 29.06.2016 passed in LPA No. 832 of 2016 only on the score of delay.

3. The present MJC No. 722 of 2021, accordingly, stands dismissed.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) saurabhkr/- U