Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1030 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2013 Thana -PALIGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav Son of Late Kameshwar Yadav, Resident of Chitar Bigha, P.S.- Paliganj, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shardanand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-03-2015 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in a criminal prosecution registered under Sections 302/201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. vide Annexure-1 as an accused and he is in judicial custody since 20.09.2014 and further taking into consideration the fact that co-accused Pintu Yadav has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order contained in Annexure-2, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. The petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur (Patna) in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 33/13, subject to the conditions that:

(A) One of the bailors must be government servant or close family member of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit in the court below showing his/her relationship with the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1030 of 2015 (3) dt.04-03-2015 2/2 (B) if the petitioner is found involved in same and similar nature of cases in future, then in that case the informant/ prosecution shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner, and if such a petition is filed, the court below would be obliged to dispose of the same in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all concerned and (C) the petitioner shall make regular pairvi in the court below in the present case either by appearing himself in person or through representation by his lawyer on each and every dates, and if on two consecutive dates petitioner fails to make pairvi, then the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U T