Sitia Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1150 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -95 Year- 2013 Thana - DHAMDAHA District- PURNIA ===================================================
1. Sitia Devi Wife of Satyanarayan Uraon.
2. Punam Devi @ Basanti Devi Wife of Harihar Uraon.
3. Suraj Uraon Son of Ramdew Uraon.
4. Vijay Uraon Son of Nunu Lal Uraon All R/o Vill.- Kukron P.S-Dhamdaha, Distt.-Purnea.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Mallick, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Uma Nath Mishra (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.
16.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 201, 120(B) & 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the nature of allegations and the fair antecedents of the Petitioners, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 95 of 2013 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1150 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.
(iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.)