Sudhir Das @ Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8462 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-226 Year-2019 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sudhir Das @ Sudhir Kumar S/O Late Pachchu Das Resident Of Village - Balaur, P.S- Gaighat, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Madhuri Kumari, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 226 of 2019 dated 07.12.2019 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 399, 402, 414, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-A), (1-AA), 26(2), 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, police got information that the petitioner and the co-accused persons were planning for committing crime. When police reached there, they started fleeing away but some of them were apprehended and on search, four country made pistols and 11 live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the coaccused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8462 of 2025(2) dt.08-04-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 02.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1206 of 2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that one pistol was recovered from the waist of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 226 of 2019.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T