Ashish Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52384 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -98 Year- 2015 Thana -AMAS District- GAYA ====================================================== Ashish Yadav Son of Dwarika Prasad Yadav Resident of village - Ahuri, P.S. - Amas, District - Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Chandra Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 387, 307, 447 and 349 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that there is specific allegation of firing upon the co-accused Santosh Yadav but there is no such allegation against the petitioner. The aforesaid co-accused Santosh Yadav has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide Annexure 2.

Having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Ashish Yadav, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Sherghatti, District Gaya, in Amas P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52384 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015 Case No. 98/15 with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner must be a close relative or family member of the petitioner who shall file affidavit before the concerned court giving complete genealogy to show his / her relationship with him. Further, if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

However, in view of the antecedents of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Gaya within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police upon his appearance.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U T