← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9441/2023bail granted

Chandan Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-03Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9441 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2023 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Chandan Kumar Ram S/O Kishun Ram @ Krishna Ram Resident of villageDevapur, Purdil Tola, P.S.- Manjhagargh, District- Gopalganj. 2.

Rahul Ram S/O Vishwanath Ram Resident of village- Bhitbherwa, P.S.- Nagar Thana Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepankar Raj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-05-2023 Heard Ld. counsel for the petitioners and Ld. APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with (Gopalganj) Excise P. S. Case No. 029 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

As per allegation, 656.640 litres of liquor was recovered from a Bolero pick-up vehicle, bearing Registration No. BR05GA-9633.

Ld. counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

2/4 this case. He further submits nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. He also submits that petitioners are driver and co-driver of the vehicle and they are not aware of the contents of the material loaded in the truck as they are just doing their duty as per direction of the owner of the vehicle. He further submits that the petitioners have been languishing in jail since 08.01.2023.

It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one. However, Ld. APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioners, above-named, to be enlarged on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with

3/4 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. Additional District and Sessions Judge-IV-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Gopalganj, in connection with (Gopalganj) Excise P. S. Case No. 029 of 2023, on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners will make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.

(ii) The petitioners will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of their absence or non-cooperation. They must be available to the police or the court whenever their presence is required. (iii) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners

4/4 after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.

(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, Ld. court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(vi) In case, the petitioners repeats offence of similar nature after enlargement on bail, their bail-bonds will be cancelled by the court below.

Ld. counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) skm/- U T