← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./903/2015bail granted

Shyam Sundar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.903 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Shyam Sundar Yadav Son of Late Kameshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Kapsandi, P.S.- Pakriwarawan. Distict - Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manish Kumar 2 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant disclosed the name of the petitioner and other accused persons on suspicion that the petitioner and others must have committed murder of Raju Yadav, Rabindra Yadav and Umesh Yadav.

It is submitted that the informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence. After recovery of the dead body of all the three deceased Shambhu Yadav in paragraph 33 of the case diary made statement naming himself to be an eye witness of the occurrence but he did not inform the informant before the recovery of the dead bodies. Shambhu Yadav happens to be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.903 of 2015 (4) dt.28-07-2015 2/2 maternal uncle of Raju Yadav. Shambhu Yadav also made his statement under section 164 of the Cr. P. C. It is further submitted that similarly situated accused Gautam Yadav has been granted regular bail vide order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50509 of 2014 and Dinesh Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail vide order passed in Cr. Misc. No. 50718 of 2014 and the case of petitioner stands on the same footing.

Considering the fact that except Shambhu Yadav who made his statement after much delay naming himself to be eye witness of the occurrence there is none to say that the petitioner committed murder of three persons and similarly situated accused Gautam Yadav has been granted regular bail as well as accused Dinesh Yadav has been granted anticipatory bail, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in Pakriwarawan P.S. Case No. 143 of 2014. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) BKS/- U T