Indrajeet Prasad @ Indrajeet Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8925 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2025 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Indrajeet Prasad @ Indrajeet Mahto, S/o- Balram Prasad, Village - Basti Jalal, P.S - Dighwara, Dist- Saran 2.
Pinki Devi, W/o- Indrajeet Prasad, Village - Basti Jalal, P.S - Dighwara, Dist- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Madhu Mala Kumari, Adv.
For the Informant :
Mr. Viksh Kumar Shukla, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026
1. Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Parsa P. S. Case No. 268 of 2025 dated 04.09.2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the BNS. 3.
The main submissions advanced by the petitioners' counsel are that the FIR itself shows that the main allegation of assaulting the informant by means of knife is against the co-accused Suman Kumari who happens to be the daughter-in-law of the informant, both the petitioners have been made accused mainly on account of being the close relatives of the co-accused Suman Kumari and against them there is no specific allegation.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8925 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel appearing for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners and submits that both the petitioners actively participated in the commission of the alleged assault.
5. In the facts and circumstance of this case and considering the above stated facts and the pleas taken by the petitioners in their petition coupled with this fact that main allegation of inflicting knife injury to the informant is against her daughter-in-law and no specific overt act has been attributed to the petitioners, in my opinion, it is a fit case for anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, let the petitioners namedabove, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Parsa P. S. Case No. 268 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
(Shailendra Singh, J) Rajiv/- U T