Ajay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9795 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2025 Thana- KOPA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Ajay Kumar Yadav S/O Bhagat Yadav R/O Village- Tarwan Pojhia, P.SKopa, Distt.- Saran. 2.
Vijay Kumar Yadav S/O Sabru Yadav @ Sanvaru Ray R/O Village- Tarwan Pojhia, P.S- Kopa, Distt.- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he had gone for grazing his cattles near a canal when the accused persons including the petitioners on two motorcycles came and assaulted him with khanti, dabia and knife causing injury on both hands and also suffered fracture of leg, further Vijay assaulted him by knife while Ajay had caught
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9795 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026 2/3 him causing cut injury on chin.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant, it is next submitted that petitioners and the informant are co-villagers and are having dispute relating to passage. It is also submitted that it were the side of the informant who were the aggressors, who had earlier assaulted the side of the petitioners for which Kopa P.S. Case No. 299 of 2025 was instituted by the side of the petitioners against the informant and his side. It is also submitted that as far as petitioner no. 1 is concerned, the allegation against him of holding the informant is ornamental in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that allegation against petitioner no. 2 is of assaulting the informant by knife causing cut injury on chin, on which the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that though it is alleged that petitioner no. 2 assaulted by knife causing injury, but then from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the same records that the injury has been caused by hard and blunt substance, on which the learned APP submits that the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9795 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026 3/3
6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner no. 1 above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kopa P.S. Case No. 303 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.
7. However, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner no. 2. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T